geert vanden bossche mass vaccination in a pandemic
Since 2014, however, he has been trying (apparently unsuccessfully) to develop his so-called universal vaccine. The #CoronavirusFacts database records . Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, Ph.D., has nothing against vaccines. To follow Dr . Calculations for herd immunity consider two sources of individual immunity vaccines and natural infection. Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics Aug 2006 - Jul 2007 Siena, Italy & Emeryville, USA Vaccine Research Program/Adjuvant Program responsibilities: - Project leader of NVD's . Exploring issues and controversies in the relationship between science and medicine. The latest example of this phenomenon comes in the form of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, who recently published an alarming manifesto. NK cells have increasingly been described to be endowed with the capacity to acquire immunological memory. After his career in Academia, Geert joined several vaccine companies (GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay . ], Ive frequently discussed how in the age of the pandemic, at least in terms of antivaccine misinformation and pseudoscience, everything old is new again. Vanden Bossche is expressing an opinion not supported by biology . One answer is, why not? Hes also started making rounds on the podcast/vlog interview circuit: You can watch yesterday's interview with Philip McMillan here: https://t.co/sx9fxpsyHg Thanks for all your support, we will need it. Follow Us : Tags Coronavirus You can throw the same virus at your innate immune system and it will not remember it. This makes no sense, Yale's Omer told us. Immunocompromised individuals with persistent COVID-19 infections, in particular, may play a huge role in the development of variants. Sufficient scientific evidence has been brought to the table. By educating these cells in ways that enable them to durably recognize and target Coronavirus-infected cells, our immune system could be perfectly armed for a targeted atack to the universe of Coronaviruses prior to exposure. Because, among other things: 1) Neither in the original March 6 piece nor his March 13 follow-up does Vanden Bossche provide any direct, non-theoretical evidence that this is happening; 2) The natural antibodies that are produced after encountering a pathogen are only a small part of a quick, effective and broad-based first-line immune-system defense known as innate or passive immunity which in fact largely comprises other components; and 3) Vanden Bossche downplays the effectiveness of the antibodies our bodies naturally produce as part of the second-line (adaptive) part of the immune system that also has served us extremely well for millennia. So-called leaky vaccines are vaccines that prevent disease, but do not appreciably slow transmission of the pathogen. Therefore he has zero credibility when it comes to advising the public or anyone else about how to avoid negative effects of mass vaccination. What Ill do instead is to point out that Dr. Vanden Bossche, whether he realizes it or not, is supporting the conventional argument with respect to COVID-19 vaccination. The virus is now able to escape immunity (so-called: immune escape). Thus if evidence emerges that particular variants do appear to influence vaccine efficacy, it should be possible to periodically reformulate the vaccines so that they better match the circulating strains. Page Flip is a new way to explore your books without losing your place. Actually, its not just eerily similar, its almost exactly the same, namely that immunity from vaccines is an evolutionary selective pressure just like the evolutionary selective pressure from antibiotics to which the organism can become resistant.. On the contrary, I can assure you that each of the current vaccines have been designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant and competent scientists. The world now stands at a crossroads again. Explanation: Experts say there is no evidence of that happening so far. Even so, concern about immune escape is one reason why Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna used the entire SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, rather than specific segments of it that might serve as antigens, so that the polyclonal antibody immune response generated would be broad and unlikely to be escaped with single mutationsor even multiple mutations. In any case, for someone who is so not antivaccine, Dr. Vanden Bossche sure is good at providing ammunition to the antivaccine movement. "It isn't," he told us. [Editors note: Scott Gavura had circumstances pop up that prevented him from producing a post for today. Vanden Bossche has created a scientific-sounding argument that vaccination will encourage the production of COVID-19 variants that our immune systems will be unprepared to fight. "The food you eat isnt sterile, he explained, the dust you inhale isnt sterile, the water you drink isnt sterile.. It's important that this book is out there. Samenvatting. Full content visible, double tap to read brief content. The situation is just too urgent! This is only going to be possible provided it escapes to the S-specific Abs that are momentarily raised in previously asymptomatically infected subjects. David Gorski on March 18, 2021 Tweet Bossche claims that the same thing will happen with the coronavirus. It won't be easy for everyone to to hear their mistakes. Vanden Bossche describes himself on LinkedIn as the inventor of a new type of vaccine that "harnesses the power of the immune system by unlocking the untapped potential of self-centered [NK] cells capable of recognising these unconventional antigens. Mass Vaccination in a Pandemic - Benefits versus Risks: Interview with Geert Vanden Bossche Vejon Health 46.7K subscribers 1.5M views 1 year ago Highlighting the principle of using a. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche is a veterinarian who recently released an open letter boldly claiming that the COVID-19 vaccines will be harmful to humanity by allowing the virus to mutate in dangerous ways If we are worried about dangerous variants emerging, it is much riskier to allow the virus to spread between unvaccinated people Its here that his LinkedIn profile helps, specifically, his entry under Univac: I founded Univac as [sic] inventor of a new vaccine technology which I subsequently further developed as CSO of the Company. He claims that the vaccines will destroy our bodies' ability to use our innate immune system (which produces, among other things, non-specific cells capable of clearing a wide variety of infectious material from the body) to fight off the variants vaccines allegedly could not. 1996-2023, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates, The Kindle title is not currently available for purchase. This new type of vaccines harnesses the power of the immune system by unlocking the untapped potential of self-centered Natural Killer (NK) cells capable of recognising these unconventional antigens. However, Bigtree, Coleman and others dont point out any of the red flags. This is not complete nonsense. There is a reason why a new flu vaccine is made each year: the influenza virus drifts and shifts and the vaccine needs to be reformulated to be a better match for the specific viruses that are predicted to be common during the next flu season. Geert Vanden Bossche says mass vaccination might boost a surge of new covid variants. GEERT VAN DEN BOSSCHE THE LAST POST He is a super expert in vaccine development. Now, lets compare the passage above to what Andrew Wakefield wrote about MMR and vaccines: Antibiotic use has selected out multiply resistant, more dangerous, and more pathogenic strains of bacteria. . Sure, we dont yet have a firm grasp of how much the vaccine decreases transmission, but there is good emerging evidence that it does significantly decrease transmission. The role of the innate immune response in COVID-19 infections is not fully understood. I am sometimes accused of attacking the person instead of simply addressing the arguments, but appraising the messenger and the phrasing of the message can be very useful. At this point, I will also mention that, because Ed Nirenberg produced an excellent rebuttal of Dr. Vanden Bossches mangling of immunology in his letter, Ill stick more to my lane (mostly, anyway), although there will be some overlap. The food you eat isnt sterile, he reminded me, the dust you inhale isnt sterile, the water you drink isnt sterile. We get exposed to a lot of microorganisms. What would you do? Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patents, but dont seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health. Although non-self and exposed on the surface of infected or pathologically altered cells, these antigens are not effectively recognised upon natural infection or disease. ON NOVEMBER 27, 2021, 7:30pm, Philippine Time, Professor Geert Vanden Bossche will be the guest speaker on the topic of "The Implications of Mass Vaccination During the Pandemic." Register now and reserve your seats. Even if it were evolving resistance, once again, the answer would be to reformulate the vaccine in order to include the altered antigens, the same conclusion made when considering the possibility that B. pertussis was evolving resistance or that evolutionary drift was leading to the predominance of strains not covered by the vaccine. Even more hilariously (and a bit uncomfortably) Frei is pretty spot on when she notes: However, this is on very shaky ground. Interestingly enough, the use of this seemingly leaky vaccine in chickens led to a reduction in the incidence of Mareks disease by 99%. Today we are in . Word Wise helps you read harder books by explaining the most challenging words in the book. I reached out to Dr. Paul Offit, a paediatrician specialized in vaccines and immunology and the co-inventor of the rotavirus vaccine, to get his thoughts on whether antibiotic resistance and vaccine-associated immune escape are indeed comparable. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we dont use a simple average. So, why then should there be a major concern using these vaccines to fight Covid-19? Not for him is the too-slow process of seeking feedback from fellow experts or publishing in the scientific literature (even on a pre-print server). It is a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the intricacies of the pandemic and the impact of mass vaccination on society. The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic : Vanden Bossche MD Phd, Geert: Amazon.es: Libros. Cases and deaths go down. Over the last several months, Ive listed a number of examples of this phenomenon of antivaxxers recycling hoary tropes to apply them to COVID-19 vaccines; for example, claims that vaccines kill, cause infertility, cancer, autoimmune disorders, and Alzheimers disease, and are loaded with toxins, among several others, such as the claim that they alter your DNA. As a creative thinker, innovator, entrepreneur and visionary, Geert has been invited to speak at multiple international congresses. Reality aside, invoking the innate immune system provides two rhetorical benefits. In scenario #2, we vaccinate as many people as we can and as quickly as we can. My statements are based on nothing else but science. For vaccines, resistance equates to strains of the microbe, the virus, or the bacteria that can elude the imperfect immunity created by the vaccine. Even if they dont prevent all transmissions, it looks like they can drastically cut the transmission chain and also reduce the amount of virus that can be transmitted in these cases. Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche is a world-class certified expert in microbiology and infectious diseases. And lest we forget: the variants of concern making headlines now arose before we had any vaccine against the coronavirus. Renowned Belgian virologist and vaccination expert Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche served as head of the German Center for Infection Research in Cologne as Head of the Vaccine Development Office. There is a sound scientific rationale to assume that it is possible to prime NK cells in ways for them to recognize and kill Coronaviruses at large (include all their variants) at an early stage of infection. For Dr. Bossche, however, the solution is not long walks on the beach, but an alleged new type of vaccine focused on training the innate immune system. Exactly. If you havent, its new to you. (Vanden Bossche did not respond to a detailed list of questions sent by Snopes on March 23, 2021.). These public commentators, often bedazzled with advanced degrees, have painted themselves as brave mavericks escaping from the mainstream herd to denounce the cataclysmic consequences of public health measures. He has a long list of companies and organizations he's worked with on vaccine discovery and preclinical research, including GSK, Novartis, Solvay Biologicals, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. COVID-19 mass vaccination will select for more virulent variants of the virus that causes COVID-19, which will escape vaccine-induced immunity and cause more severe disease. More recently, he set up his own website to publicize his letter: We've put together a website to gather all information, scientific documents and interviews I've posted on this public health emergency. This sharply contrasts with conventional targeting of natural immune responses as induced by conventional vaccines. In their lengthy medical op-ed on LifeSite News, Dr. Paul Alexander and Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche warn the public health decision makers that the mass vaccination program that uses "imperfect non . Thankfully, there is a vaccine against it, but over time, newer and more virulent strains of the virus have been detected, and this made scientists think it was because the vaccine was leaky, that it did not allow the chicken to mount a good enough immune response. This strategy is based on vaccines that target the adaptive arm of our immune system, the same principle that allowed us to slay smallpox and bring polio and measles down to their knees. As those have stronger affinity for the pathogen (e.g., virus) and can reach high concentrations, they can quite easily outcompete our natural Abs for binding to the pathogen/virus. Potentially leaky vaccine but stellar disease reduction. Some of these copies may by chance have the right kinds of errors in their genetic code to become variants of concern, although the mutation rate of this coronavirus is quite low. So the question becomes: do the COVID-19 vaccines give us low or high levels of neutralizing antibodies? Dr. Vanden Bossche has become world famous for warning Humanity against the health danger of conducting mass vaccination programs during a pandemic. If there emerge SARS-CoV-2 variants that are less susceptible to the immunity produced by COVID-19 vaccines, the answer is to reformulate the vaccines! The resulting type of immune response is unprecedented and licenses the host immune system to readily eliminate infection or to cure disease across a broad range of unrelated pathogens and/ or mammalian species. Nirenberg goes further and notes that the antibody titers induced by vaccines are MUCH higher than those seen after infection, and we see hallmarks of memory responses induced by these vaccines from even a single dose, suggesting that, even though there is a decrease in neutralization by vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, that might not portend a loss in protection. Mass vaccination will only work if the vaccine prevents or decreases transmission; i.e., if it is not leaky (although he doesnt use the term). With antibiotic use, the bacteria that have developed a mutation or acquired a gene that gives them protection from the antibiotic will escape death and soon become the dominant strain. I believe I speak for many scientists when I say: show us the evidence. 1995 - 2023 by Snopes Media Group Inc. Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD, DVM Independent Researcher --- Mar 2018 - Present . "There can be no doubt," Vanden Bossche asserts, "that lack of exposure due to stringent containment measures implemented as of the beginning of the pandemic has not been beneficial to keeping peoples innate immune system well trained. Vaccinating during a pandemic is "unthinkable" and is causing deaths, the winner of the 2008 Nobel Prize for Medicine said. Vanden Bossche is using an eerily similar argument about COVID-19 vaccines and SARS-CoV-2, he wrote for the blog Science-Based Medicine, to the one used by Wakefield about [the measles-mumps-rubella] vaccine and measles. Moreover, as Nirenberg points out, there is an increasing body of evidence that the COVID-19 vaccine is not leaky. bit.ly/MassVaxxinPandemic voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org. Another important counterpoint to Dr. Bossches claim is that we can simply reformulate our vaccines to match new variants of concern. Such claims are generally an offshoot of another favorite antivaccine claim, namely that the diseases being vaccinated against are so innocuous that vaccinating against them is overkill and allowing infection and natural herd immunity to occur is better, a trope that has also been resurrected about COVID-19, a disease thats killed well north of 500K people in just the US in a little over a year. It won't be easy for everyone to to hear their mistakes. The production of targeted antibodies obviously creates a different response than a natural infection because "you're producing antibodies against specific needs therefore you have a limited targeted immune response, not the whole response that you see after an infection." The notion that this is somehow a problem relies on the unsupported claim that a natural infection would be better equipped to kill SARS-CoV-2. Thats antibiotic resistance. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness. https://t.co/DPYKE7kxmM, Geert Vanden Bossche (@GVDBossche) March 15, 2021, The science behind the catastrophic consequences of thoughtless human intervention in the Covid-19 pandemic. And if you have been at this for a while, like Dr. David Gorski who has followed and denounced the anti-vaccination movement since time immemorial, you may even pick up on similarities with the disgraced Andrew Wakefield. Visit Geert at https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/ and stay updated on his latest blogs, projects, and videos. Please try again. There you have it, the lone scientific maverick who is the only one willing to speak out about against a horror being perpetrated by conventional medicine and science that they dont want you to know about or discuss, a horror thats so urgent that he must speak now. Dr. Bossches idea that the coronavirus will simply continue moving from person to person and that vaccines will only prevent severe disease is contradicted by the data that is accumulating. "Natural infection kills. While scientists dont yet know exactly what levels of antibodies are needed to ward off disease, the approved vaccines do elicit the production of neutralizing antibodies. This book provides a thought-provoking analysis of the complex interactions between the virus and the host immune system that underlie the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. Vanden Bossche's argument, however, basically boils down to the idea that current COVID-19 vaccines, in conjunction with other preventive measures, are making the pandemic exponentially worse by breeding infectious variants. Follow. Geert is now primarily serving as a Biotech/Vaccine consultant while also conducting his own research on Natural Killer cell-based vaccines. There's even grift likely involved! I will note that it is truly astounding how many statements that a supposed expert in immunology and vaccines can make that are just plain out-and-out wrong. This will, indeed, require large vaccination campaigns. It looks like WhatsApp is not installed on your phone. To use an analogy, if a gaggle of invaders is coming but you have only managed to round up a few soldiers, be prepared for a long siege during which the enemy might learn a thing or two about your defences and adapt. As I go through Dr. Vanden Bossches open letter, Ill point out the similarities, while also noting differences when they occur. Dont you see? Our immune system is divided into two main branches: innate and adaptive. Your membership is the foundation of our sustainability and resilience. vulnerable but also in PAI subjects. Very interested in spirituality. Its a rationale for developing reformulated booster vaccines that cover variants not well covered by the currently-used COVID-19 vaccines. The more extensively the later age group will be vaccinated and hence, protected, the more the virus is forced to continue causing disease in younger age groups. Biology is so complex. When you read Dr. Bossches open letter, you should pick up on the Galileo gambit, which is when you infer that because Galileo was laughed at but ultimately correct, your laughable idea must also be correct. When this happens, the immune system has to rely on more specialized effectors of our immune system (i.e., antigen-specific Abs and T cells) to fight the pathogen. This is not all that impressive, given that Snopes could only identify two patent applications in Vanden Bossche's name both for "immunologic formulations" and both of these patents, records indicate, had their "applications terminated before publication.". You should pick up on his apocalyptic language (there is no time to spare, if we are committed to perpetuating our species) and turns of phrases that would be more at home in a superhero movie (guardians of mankind). It appears that Vejon Health is a dormant company, if it exists at all. Vaccines make use of the adaptive part of our immune system. Vaccines can put a stop to that. Coordinated Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation's Ebola Vaccine Program and contributed to the implementation of an integrated vaccine work plan in collaboration with Global Health Partners (WHO, Bill \u0026 Melinda Gates Foundation, CDC, UNICEF), regulators (FDA) and vaccine manufacturers to enable timely deployment or stockpiling of Ebola vaccine candidates.Sharing his perspective on mass vaccination in COVID-19.You can support us with a financial contribution through Patreon. So its not surprising that Dr. Vanden Bossches letter reminds me of Andrew Wakefields warning about the MMR vaccine. Specifically, Im referring to the abuse of evolutionary theory by antivaxxers to claim that vaccines select for more deadly variants of pathogenic viruses and bacteria, making mass vaccination programs dangerous or even potentially catastrophic. Truly, in the age of COVID-19, everything old is new again, and the antivaccine grift continues. These assumptions come without scientific studies or data to support them and indeed are not always reasonable. Finally, a few words on Dr. Bossche himself and the rhetorical tricks he uses in his manifesto. By comparison, the adaptive immune system has a memory built in. The solution to that risk is to vaccinate as many people as quickly as possible, thereby reducing both transmission of the virus and the number of environments in which mutations could occur. Geert Vanden Bossche is a scientist who published an open letter warning of global catastrophe due to deadly variants of COVID-19 selected for by mass vaccination. This fallacy is one of the anti-vaccine movement's favorites, and as such his claims have been amplified extensively by the biggest names in that movement. In any case, I got a particularly strong brave maverick vibe from this passage: While there is no time to spare, I have not received any feedback thus far. His argument is that the COVID-19 vaccine is leaky, that it does not prevent transmission, allowing the evolution of nasty variants in the absence of symptomatic disease. We can hardly say we didnt know or were not warned. In short, if we are concerned about the virus mutating to evade vaccine protection, the solution is to vaccinate as many people as quickly as possible and to eventually reformulate the vaccines to match variants of concern that acquire this ability. By the time I get through this, I suspect youll understand why the misinformation that Dr. Vanden Bossche is selling (and I use the word selling intentionally, as I suspect theres grift involved) is nonsense and nothing more than repackaged antivax tropes. Variants are "a thing to keep an eye on," Saad Omer, an epidemiologist who serves as director of the Yale Institute for Global Health, told us in a phone interview. We'll try to work on further translations and regular updates. He does apparently have some history working on vaccines.